Many things can determine a good restaurant.
Beyond the classic parameters of food, service and atmosphere, often we can also judge a good restaurant on the stringent system of awards. This can be via Michelin stars, or depending on where in the world you live, chef hats, gourmet traveller awards, or regional championships.
Such awards cannot be scoffed at, for often they indicate that the restaurant has met a stringent series of checks, indicators and questions to be awarded the right to either hang a particular trophy on their wall, or state proudly under the restaurant’s name the award in question.
The Michelin guide is the gastronomically correct bible of restaurant awards.
In some countries, especially France (where it was first released) and all over Europe, chefs the world over quiver in expectation when the latest red clad edition of the guide is released. In some hospitality circles, the Michelin guide has the same expectation and hype associated with it that one would expect with the Academy Awards.
When André Michelin first launched the guide in 1900, he would not have expected it to become the near all powerful reference for restaurants globally that it has become today. Michelin as a company is far more famous as being the largest global tyre producer in the world, with annual income exceeding 16 billion Euros.
In 1926 the famous star was introduced to the guide, and now covers France and most countries in Europe, as well as having guides for New York, San Francisco, Tokyo, Los Angeles and Las Vegas.
The ratings themselves have been victim to criticism, with many believing that the guides are “pro-French” or that they prefer an elegant, detailed and sophisticated dining experience.
A former Michelin inspector Pascal Rémy once claimed that the standards of the guide were lax, and that resources and procedures were famously exaggerated.
Either way, the company fiercely guards the identity of their inspectors and staff, and working under the umbrella of such a large international company certainly allows their famous judges the ability to carry out their work.
In some guides, most notably that in New York, it has strict competition with the reviews compiled by the New York Times and that of the Zagat guide.
But these guides are all well and good, but in many respects they are similar to the fore mentioned Academy Awards. They are great for glitz and glamour, but for many people (with the greatest respect to any carriers of the awards) somewhat irrelevant.
After all, can anyone honestly say that their favourite movie is a Best Picture Oscar winner?
Take for example a Michelin 3 star restaurant, a distinction that less than 100 restaurants around the world could ever hope to hold.
For starters, many of us will never eat in such an establishment.
Equally, the intense creations of some of these experiences, especially when it comes to the most expensive and unique food creations, will only serve to cause frustration and confusion in what are by and large untrained and mundane palettes.
A fantastic example of this is a classic meat pie advertisement, where two men are sitting on a sidewalk hungrily devouring two pastry baked fat traps while watching another couple of males sit in a restaurant delicately eating haute cuisine.
It is an image and scene many would feel comfortable in associating with.
The sheer definition of gastronomy, a constant theme or word when talking about restaurant analysis or detailed guides, is not only the food, but the combination of culture when it comes to the creation and cooking of dishes.
For mine, this is the grave error which many award winning and high end establishments make.
As soon as a large slice of society walks in to such a place, they would instantly feel uncomfortable.
How then can this be classed by the individual as a good restaurant, if despite impeccable service and stellar cuisine, at no point does one feel relaxed and at ease?
Equally, the awarding of such awards can often conflict with the most demanding restaurant attribute one could ever hope to wield – that of consistency.
Some venues prepare or are conscious of when an inspector or critic is about to arrive, and vary their approaches accordingly.
But the greatest asset any restaurant can have is the ability to be consistent, so that expectation and delivery of service and product alike is the same every time.
This, combined with comfort, ensures that a restaurant is a good one, before any such awarding or nomination of a championship or gong.
After all, an award is given based on a decision by an individual, and how can that individual represent the tastes of the spectrum of society that could hope to walk through the door?
Read Your Guests
-
The other night we got slammed and the kitchen was running behind. I had
this couple who had a some appetizers and salad and were waiting for their
main co...
10 hours ago




